BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
yoonytoons <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:58:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Greetings, again:

Of course, Murray, I am not talking about using queen cells to requeen, a
too time-consuming procedure for most American commercial outfit,
operating on efficacy-paradigm.  I am talking about simply ordering
hundreds or thousands of queens for immediate replacement, for they will
start laying eggs immediately without losing the valuable time, especially
at the onset of a heavy honey flow.  Similarly, I am not talking about
requeening with Russians for improvement of the stock, either.  I am
merely talking about requeening solely to invigorate the egg-laying and
thus maximize the honey production.  I nevertheless always appreciate many
of you Brits brining different perspectives to the table, though.

To start, I would like to hear about any research done on the *long-term
consequences of annual requeening*, if such study has ever been done.

Yoon

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2