BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:40:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Peter said:

> Do you not agree that a bee colony from which you would have removed the
potentially
> contaminated frame would also after removal of said frame still contain 9
other
> potentially spore contaminated frames!

> what benefit would be derived by the removal of only one frame from a AFB
> contaminated colony?

My basic assumption is that any detected AFB results some vigorous shaking
followed by a small bonfire.  What I was talking about was the odds of
removing spores that were undetected. By definition this means a very very
limited infection, perhaps with spores encapsulated by wax and/or propolis
on no more than one frame.

If you feel that there are holes in that rationalization through which
one could drive several inconveniently large 55-foot tractor trailer trucks
of beehives, so be it.

I'm at least doing something, which has to be better than doing nothing.


        jim (Who wonders how Ebay bought PayPal...
           Did Ebay buy PayPal on Ebay?
           Did Ebay pay via PayPal? )

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2