BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:42:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>   For beekeepers they will say the ban was worthless as it was a partial
> ban,  and farmers will be obviously ticked as they have to prove losses to
> move ahead.  Proving a loss,  now that’s painful,  not only do you as a
> farmer have to do the math,  then you have to go somewhere and plaed your
> poverty case.... talk about rubbing it in!
>
>
As I mentioned before they don't have to prove a loss.  They can be
proactive and do soil pest scouting instead.

From a governmental point-of-view - the province can't actually ban the use
of pesticide - that can only be done federally.  The province can restrict
how the pesticide is used.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2