BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Oland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:46:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Was there more to the report (confirming these claims) that was not quoted
in the post?  There is no indication that the "mite drop" on either chemical
was dead or live mites (another reason to use a screened bottom board).
Nor, that the mite drop from the Apistan was not enough to control the mite
population   3,800 mites per day, after 42 days, even with decreasing
numbers each days, as the population decreases, should eliminate even a very
large population of mites.

K Oland

-----Original Message-----
From: Blane White

The problem is that the mites that were dropped by the apistan were not =
killed.  Also the percent of the total mite population dropped by apistan =
was not high enough to give control of the varroa mites in these hives.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2