BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:14:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>but there is only one

> confirmed case in which a social signal includes airborne sound that is
> detected and
> evaluated by receivers: the forager recruitment dances in Apis spp.
> honeybees
>

Why do they not include the case of queen piping?  Substrate vibration is
likely *less* important than in recruitment because the queens may be on
separate combs (or in a case more commonly observed by beekeepers in
separate bars in a queen bank).  I do not think I am the only beekeeper to
get the impression that piping causes other queens to respond (I have heard
it describe as challenging other queens).  If it is not an airborne social
signal what is the purpose of piping?

Stan

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2