BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:11:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> Sexual selection is a dominant force in the evolution of many animals and can be particularly significant in species that mate in aerial swarms characterized by strong male–male competition. However, such mating biology, typical of many social insects, is also quite challenging to study. Here, we investigate sexual selection in the honey bee that has 2 distinct male morphs (normal sized and small). Males mate only once and females return to their nest after mating, making it possible to measure the lifetime fitness of both sexes. We allowed known numbers of normal-sized males from 6 colonies and small males from another 6 colonies to compete for natural matings with experimental virgin queens. We then determined the mating success of males by genotyping the offspring of these queens. 

> Colonies differed by an order of magnitude in the intrinsic mating success of their males, confirming that the reproductive fitness of honey bee colonies is highly variable. Small males achieved approximately half as many matings as expected given their number of flights and, in addition, had a significantly smaller share of paternity per mating than normal-sized males. Interestingly, the flight activity of small males suggested that they may compensate for their lower compet- itiveness by flying outside the most competitive mating period in the afternoon. The lower fitness of small males shows that sexual selection is strong in honey bees and contributes to inclusive fitness dynamics that favor worker cooperation within their societies. 

> Does size matter? We found clear evidence that small honey bee males were less successful at mating than normal-sized males. Small males, in- troduced at a frequency similar to that under natural conditions, obtained approximately half the number of matings expected, given both the numbers of males marked and the numbers observed flying. In addition, small males that did mate obtained only 61% of the paternity share obtained by normal-sized males ... The large size of normal males is presumably under strong selective pressure because it affords greater mating success, and it seems probable that small males may be weaker fliers ...

Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published March 5, 2010
Sexual selection in honey bees: colony variation and the importance of size in male mating success. Margaret J. Couvillon, et al

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2