BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:42:58 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> The point I was trying to make was that if laws are enacted to ban certain
> classes of insecticides, other ones will be invented with different
> structures that have similar modes of action, just like this one.
>

Isn't that a good thing?  Neonicotinoids DO have the beneficial property of
low mammalian toxicity.  But they have some really bad properties as well
(such as very long soil half life).  One of your earlier posts indicated
that sulfoxaflor does not have a long residual life.  Is also has more
reversible binding.  So isn't that good if we enact laws to ban a
problematic class and invent others with similar modes of action but
improvements?

Stan

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2