So there is polen in honey, therefore it is a constituent and not an
ingredient.  Period.

The rest is a legal trick created by the antiGMO lobby with the pseudo
beekeepers included.
I am sure they will regret afterwards when only the labs will make money
out of all this.

And I understand that ,eventough the European Court, the Bavarian Court
judged against Mr. Bablok
http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2013/10/31/monsanto-zerstoert-honig-imker-muessen-jahres-ernte-vernichten/

So yes, I won't try to convince a Muslim that the there is no problem on
eating pork, like I won't try to convince a european that there is no risk
in the GM pollen in honey, the client is always right.

But please, do not trick the law. Pollen is a constituent of honey. If you
defend something in contrary became a pseudobeekeeper for me.
A proper beekeeper is a steward of the bees and the hive products.

This no more than a non tariff barrier that goes againt how bees and honey
production works. The european fight against GMO have put beekeeping as the
Ham of the Sandwich in this ideological fight.

I wrote in December 2011 a long and open letter to "Walter Haefeker and his
antiGMo mates", but it is in spanish.
http://apiaraucania.blogspot.com/2011/12/precio-de-la-miel-2011-2012.html
you are invited to read it.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html