BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:01:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
There was a recent thread discussing the supressive effects of broodless periods on varroa populations, particularly in Russian strains. I have made some observations that seem to correlate perfectly with these statements.

 I had two hives (one New World Carnie, one Russian hybrid) from which I pulled the queens in an attempt to stop a strong swarm urge, hoping for new mated quens in both hives.  No dice on the mated queens, so I put the original queens back in about 3 weeks ago.

Before I pulled the queens, I was seeing moderate mite falls in both hives (side by side).  Now I'm not seeing any mite falls at all, and very few on drone brood.  It would appear that the broodless period had a substantial impact on total varroa population.  I've also noticed that the queens seem to be laying at an accelerated pace, seemingly making up for lost time.

I wonder if a usable, chemical free varroa management plan could be built around this concept, without sacrificing too much production?

Any thoughts?

Just thinking aloud (which admittedly gets me into trouble sometimes...)

Todd.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2