BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alyn W. Ashworth" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jan 1997 14:50:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, "Dr. Pedro Rodriguez"
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>I became initiated with the Varroa struggle in Europe. If you study the
>spread of Varroa mites through the Eastern European countries and then
>onto France and the Iberian pennninsula, you will have to agree with me
>that relaxed management conditions are responsible for the magnitude of
>spread of those mites.
 
Surely comb-trapping (as with any other method of varroa control) is
only likely be carried out by non-relaxed bee-keepers. One has to assume
that they will destroy any varroa that they *encourage*, although I
think we have established that by using worker combs, there can be no
questions of *encouraging varroa breeding*.
 
I suppose (from a position of comparative ignorance) that if a malignant
bee-keeper were to deliberately trap the Q on drone comb and allow the
drones to hatch, and then repeat the operation, then additional varroa
would result - but I find this unlikely, to say the least. It would be
his own colonies that would suffer first!
 
--
Alyn W. Ashworth
Lancashire & North-West Bee-Keepers' Association. UK.
(but I don't speak on their bee-half)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2