BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:32:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
that is good and interesting info..  Which I have seen.   BUT the data about what wax has shown to contain is worthless.  
What we need to know is whats in typical hives treated and untreated,  in Heavy neonics usage areas,  and in areas with little to no application.   What levels do hives that are apparently healthy have,  and what level in unhealthy hives??

Any good problem solver can tell you what you really need to know is the difference between whats good,  and whats bad.

I have had pollen and wax samples taken,  and unfortunately no results back yet.  But in the scheme of things it won't tell me a lot anyway.  why?  because we only sampled some of my best old hives.  it will be interesting to see the info.

What we need is real exposure values for both healthy and unhealthy hives.  
what we need is what are the exposure levels in AG areas like mine,  and areas where They are not used.  
As mentioned a Use map should show a strong correation in weak hives,  and it doesn't  lets prove that and why.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2