> Label or no label, use of sulfoxaflor appears to be clearly prohibited.

I've explained at length how "use" is not properly covered by FIFRA, I've
cited the appropriate statutes, I've even quoted the EPA itself making
precisely this point.

While I understand that it is an obscure point, overlooked by many, I fail
to understand why there is this refusal to accept the fact that the law has
loopholes in it.

So let me quote Peter Borst's post in this thread:

"You have provided no concrete evidence...
If you have it, present it."

Show me where in FIFRA, "use" is mentioned, and how a pesticide with a
revoked registration is still subject to control over how existing stocks of
the pesticide is used.

	

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html