BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:27:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:23:02 -0800, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>They could find no positve correlation between varroa levels and viruses.
>"In fact, many colonies that ...tested positive for IAPV or KBV had low or
>nontectectable Varroa mite infestation levels."

L. Bailey wrote in 2001:

> The severe, widely-publicised disease of bees, referred to as ‘the Isle of
Wight disease’ in Britain early in the last century when colonies were more
numerous than subsequently, was wrongly attributed to the mite, which causes
no overt symptoms. The disease was almost certainly caused by bee paralysis
virus, which does cause the symptoms and is independent of the mite, and
which is similarly associated with large densities of bee colonies.

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2