BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: MAQS results
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 18:52:35 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
>So do a finishing round in the end with apivar andpost the results here
for us to see.

Walter, I have no doubt that Apivar works very well for the time being.  In
a trial of 160+ hives that I recently started with nucs, I applied Apivar
to get a mite-free start.

I have nothing personal against Apivar.  As I've posted recently, there are
reasons that some might choose not to use, nor come to depend upon,
amitraz.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2