BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:36:47 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Aaron, of course, is right and I stand humbly corrected. :)  It was supposed be OVARIOLES not ovaries.  I am glad this was picked up.

I have another question on this topic: is the number of ovarioles what determines the ultimate size of the queen or the age of the larva that results in the bigger queen?

I ask this because I've heard/read that colonies headed smaller queens sometimes outproduce other colonies.  Mating is the other side of the coin but this may be due to better genetics allowing potentially fewer - since from a smaller queen - harder working workers outshine their peers.

Waldemar
Long Island, NY

>>All queens have 2 ovaries.  Waldemar's statement should read, "an indicator of how many OVARIOLES would become functional."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2