BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:01:13 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
>I find no problem is asking the EPA reconsider their decision on the use
of insecticides - especially Neonics.  That is what the President and
Congress have asked the EPA to do.

Actually, if you read the letter to Congress, the word "insecticide" is
only mentioned twice (once in reference to a title)--neonicotinoids are
mentioned 19 times.  What the letter signers did was to kowtow to some
activist constituents and "do something," which is what congress critters
do when someone complains.

The problem is, that an ill-informed group of congressmen are parroting
specific suggestions that only apply to the neonics.  In my opinion,
pollinators would have been far better served had those congressmen instead
used the word "pesticides" throughout.

I completely agree with the regulatory requests of the congressmen, but not
limited solely to the neonics, but rather to *all* pesticides.  If the
issue is to protect pollinators, then we should apply blanket pressure upon
EPA to do so, not simply to single out a single class of products.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2