BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Calculating Efficacy
From:
allen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:07:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
> For fall the story is different. Mites tripled in the untreated
> control based on collected dead mites from the finishing treatment.
> In the washed 300 bees  the mite increased 7 times in the untreated
> control during the treatment period.

Very interesting.

> Allan A lot of mite counting, we suffered from nightmares
> (mitemares) when you think about it.

Thanks for the explanation, and thanks to you and
your crew for all the work.

Seeing how you did this and also what was going on during that span of
time is most enlightening.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2