BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:44:31 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Peter L Borst
> In the following
> chapter, only Nosema apis is described. Both types are presumably very
> similar.
> NOSEMOSIS OF BEES
> http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/en_mmanual.htm
> http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mmanual/2008/pdf/2.02.04_NOSEMOSIS.pdf

Hi Peter

I see that the chapter was written in 2008, but wonder why.  It summarises 
the position with N apis well enough - but that is something that has 
already been well documented many times and which, I think, few of us would 
question.

It is perhaps unfortunate that it then says: 'Both types are presumably very 
similar.'  Once again we have a presumption without any evidence; indeed, 
when the paper was written some important differences were well-known.
Best wishes

Peter Edwards
beekeepers at stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2