BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Nov 2007 18:36:20 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >"[log in to unmask]"  wrote:  "no other ag related industry in the 
nation allows this kind of uncontrolled movement"

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:22:36 -0700, Mike Rossander  wrote:

>  To the contrary, they almost all allow that kind of movement.  You'd have better luck building a 
list of restrictions than building the list of unrestricted activities.
>

how can anyone defend the willy nilly unregulated movement of bees when there is the risk of spreading the dreaded CCD? or maybe CCD is no big deal at all and that's why mass movement goes on unimpeded? 

It's called inertia.  It has been done like this for years, and unless there is a MAJOR push to change things, it will continue as before.  By the way, I don't see this push happening.  Just be thankful that the bees are more resilliant than the beekeepers that keep them.

Mike in LA

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2