BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"E.t. Ash" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:27:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
a Peter Loring Borst snip followed by > my comment..
I don't use honeybee, either, though Seeley does. 

In Google Scholar, "honeybee" gets 140,000 hits while "honey bee" gets 289,000. 

For best results use: "honeybee" OR "honey bee" -- that brings up 325,000 citations. I have read them all, too.

> I once had a conversation about this difference with Dr Thomas (he has his name on the bee lab and apiary inspection building at Texas A&M) and he told me he was there when this convention was decided upon for publication here in the US.  Might get this backward but I seem to recall honey bee was considered proper in England but honeybee was the proper term in the US. I would guess us non academic types can use either and no one would be much confused?

Gene in central Texas...

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2