BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:27:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Dee Lusby wrote:
>The queen acquires exact traits from the workers as she is an exact copy, as no queen can be raised except she be born a worker first and then choosen by same to be changed into a queen as they (the workers) construct queen cells.

Comment:
The queen "acquires" no traits from the workers. I have a real problem with this pseudo-biological explanation for what is a highly speculative theory. Science isn't everything, but it also isn't *nothing*. I don't have a college degree in any scientific field but the above goes against what I learned in elementary school.

The queen is not an exact copy of the workers, any more than I am an exact copy of my brother. In fact, in a colony of bees, there may be thousands of sisters with many different fathers. Hardly exact copies. But a queen cannot inherit anything from her sisters, any more than I inherited anything from my sister.

Also, the queen is not "born a worker first". The egg is an undifferentiated female, with the possibility of becoming a worker, a queen or something in between, depending on when it the queen rearing process is initiated.

pb

ATOM RSS1 RSS2