BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Harris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:50:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Berry, Owens, Delaplane

http://www.ent.uga.edu/bees/documents/m08138.pdf



Ellis, Hayes, Ellis

http://www.springerlink.com/content/lk80j0017v01w026/



Seeley, Griffin

http://www.springerlink.com/content/8g697443p6274022/





These are the three most recent studies that I’m aware of, to look at the
effect of small cell on varroa populations. I’ve read the studies and have
read many critiques examining the minute details of each. Remembering that
these are applied science studies i.e. conducted in a real world
environment as opposed to a highly controlled laboratory setting and as
such they are surely exposed to unintended variables. Having said that,
those who challenge the results of each based on its individual ‘flaws’
would, in my opinion, have us believe that those flaws, unique to each
study, somehow conspired to produce the same wrong conclusion in every
case.

I believe that if one looks at the body of evidence from the accumulated
data of the whole, the results are obvious. To deny it, in my opinion, is
to embrace an unreasonably high degree of ugly coincidence.


*Dan Harris*

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2