BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:33:28 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Pete, could you please clarify something for those of us who aren't
molecular biologists?

Neither Whitfield nor Harpur make it clear from where they are deriving
their SNPs--Harpur does not mention the word "nuclear" and Whitfield uses
it only once (but not relative to his methods).

Both authors state the problems with mitotyping (based upon mitochondrial
DNA), but neither makes it clear to me that they are comparing SNPs only
from nuclear DNA (which would be the genes associated with behavioral
traits).

Could you please clarify this for the benefit of the List?

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2