BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:40:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Chilling, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide have all been used in assays to make bees easier to handle.  All of these plus marking paints and handling can contribute to bee loss or increased susceptibility to the test treatment.


Before he passed, Larry Atkins and I compared notes.   Far too many investigators fail to limit handling stress.  For pesticide contact assays, some private labs put the bees to sleep at least three times.  Both Larry and I tried to slow down or immobolize bees for as short a time as possible before they 'woke'.  We agreed, done properly, bee loss from the handling (putting them to sleep) should have little effect.  But even a bit of delay can escalate losses, increase vulnerability to treatment.  For both of us, we had our techniques down to where if we got bee loss above 5% for the 'controls', we felt that we had compromised the trials.




Jerry







             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2