BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Re-infestation by varroa
From:
David Evans <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 03:52:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Old, but by no means irrelevant ... these studies closely mirror a report by Wyatt Mangum in ABJ (151:475) who saw an average of up to 10 mites/day acquired by mite-free colonies, with the maximum influx appearing during a dearth of nectar.

Interesting that drone excluders didn't reduce this. I presume the number of phoretic mites on drones is related to the infestation rate in the 'donor' colony. If this was very high, coupled with the increased propensity for drones to travel, it might lead to longer range infestations ... meaning that the area over which coordinated treatments are used would have to be much larger.

I'd be interested in other related publications if anyone is aware of them ...

Cheers
David

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2