BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:29:22 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>
> >Can you elaborate on why you state " for at least one generation"? Do you
> consider commercially- available pollen subs limited in that respect.


The Holy Grail for pollen subs is to develop one that will provide
sufficient nutrition to allow bees without access to natural pollen to rear
more than two generations of workers (emerging workers rearing the next
generation).

The data from my trial suggest that the best subs outperformed natural
pollen for the first generation, then started to fall off.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2