BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:45:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
--- allen dick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/Publications.htm?seq_no_115=178712
>
> Well, I think the article you cited does not
> actually confirm your
> assertions.

Yes it does.  The SMR (suppression of mite
reproduction) was named because it was thought the
bees increased the infertility of mites.

This was show to not be the case, therefore "SMR" dose
does not exist!  This varroa specific hygienic
behavior needs a new name as SMR does not fit here
now.



Joe Waggle ~ Derry, PA
Small Cell Beekeeping
‘Bees Gone Wild Apiaries'
http://www.biologicalbeekeeping.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Organicbeekeepers/




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2