BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:10:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> Me too. In a top bar, foundationless, hive in which I measured worker
> cells top left, centre and bottom right, both sides, the sizes ranged from
> 4.9 to 5.8mm, averaging 5.2.
>
>
Same thing that Dennis Murrel found years ago and was pilloried by the
small cell, adherents.Couldn't be since it worked for some vocal
missionaries. He did some great work way back when.

4.9 as natural is still being preached in spite of the evidence to the
contrary. I gave up trying to correct our local adherents who keep losing
bees every winter and cannot figure out why.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2