BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lloyd Spear <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:24:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In part, Peter Borst said beekeepers "want to cite somebody else for
causing the colony decline that they have failed to prevent."

Does anyone recall that when this all started the beekeeper responsible for
'ringing the bell' had just been told by the inspectors in Maine that his
hives were in danger of collaspe because of varroa loads?  And the
immediate response on the part of certain large commercial beekeepers was
that 'the government' should establish a program for reimbursement of dead
hives?

Some have said that all the constant blame placed on the neonicitinoids was
to deflect any possible idea that 'the beekeepers' were responsible!

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2