BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:46:07 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>would say a new package started on foundation in one of these areas
suffice?

> >Of course, you would first have to find some foundation free of chemical
> contaminants.
>

This is a problem for any field-realistic trial involving
pesticides--finding controls that aren't exposed to contaminants in the
combs. Foundation wax generally contains residues of lipophilic
pesticides.  Most of the pre-neonic insecticides were lipophilic to some
degree.

However, in the case of the neonics, since they are not lipophilic, this
problem would be less applicable to studies involving them.  The bees would
still be exposed to residues of fluvalinate, coumaphos, etc., but not to
starting residues of neonics.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2