BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:03:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I read:
>Apiguard's efficacy proved by numerous tests
>
>The results of tests conducted throughout the world show an average 90%
>efficacy rate. In France successful clinical tests have been undertaken by
>the AFSSA at Sophia-Antipolis. Practical tests have been carried out by a
>large number of beekeepers from all regions and climatic zones in France.
>Their conclusions have on the one hand served to confirm the efficacy of
>the product (93% on average), and on the other to adapt and determine the
>conditions required to use the treatment.


I wrote twice to the manufacturers to get copies of the "tests" but they
did not reply. Has anyone else seen reports of these tests? I have been
told that no new Section 18 exemptions can be issued in states where
coumaphos is still effective.

pb

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
BEE-L has no "Frequently Asked Questions",
but any topic can be reviewed by searching
the  archives.  The archives are the FAQ!
BEE-L archives can be searched at:
 http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2