BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Rowbottom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:48:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On 14 July 2017 at 00:57, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> Re the Woodcock study, it is interesting to see the colony strengths PRIOR
> TO EXPOSURE to the neonics.  In the UK groups, they mostly ranged from 1025
> to 2500 adult bees.
>

Randy

I have worked occasionally with a local bio-pesticide test Company here in
the UK.  They are staffed exclusively  with really well qualified people,
very knowledgeable about pesticides, test methodologies, regulations and
regulators, the literature on pesticides and about a wide range of insects
in general.  HOWEVER individually and collectively they knew very little
about beekeeping practicalities.

I wonder if a similar issue may be acting among the authors and institutes
of this CEH paper?  That might explain why they have not picked up that in
many cases they were using very small colonies, unrealistic of colonies
that will be placed to work on farmed crops.

Regards

Mike Rowbottom

Harrogate
UK

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2