BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:31:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
>
> >In cases where the actual development time is 19 days, there is a much
> better explanation: they're either Apis cerana or they're African
> bees.


Pete, 19 days development time for worker bees was within the "normal" range
of A mellifera in the US back in the 1950's (Hoopingarner, pers comm), and
appears to still be so today (pers obs in Calif--non Africanized bees).

I am in no way engaging in Allen's resurrection of the small cell
debate--just clarifying a point about development time :)

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2