BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 May 2012 00:37:13 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
...seems a rather absurd response.

Dr. Fischer is claiming that no one has shown a correlation between neonic exposure and CCD (which I believe to be the case).

The author responds with:
"I don’t think you’ve proved your assertion that neonicotinoids are not a factor in CCD. Indeed, the majority of the papers you cite (a small subset of the relevant research) don’t definitively dismiss neonicotinoids as blameless as a factor in CCD."

...in the (admitted) absence of correlating data, the author cries foul because the negative hasn't been proven.....have their been any studies dismissing Forbes and their staff from responsibility for CCD?

deknow

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2