BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:03:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Hi all
I am skeptical that a decent substitute for pollen can be found or made, any more than there is a decent substitute for turkey and apple pie at Thanksgiving. To wit:

To have equated pollen with protein as effectively as had been done in the experiments
of Goetze and Bessling (1959) and Freudenstein (1960), recalls the
admonition of De Groot (1953): more is known of the foodstuffs than of the
nutritional requirements of bees. The fact that not a single pollen substitute
(chosen on the basis of its apparent protein value) gave the same result as bee-collected
pollen makes one wonder whether there is something more to pollen that still eludes us.

Hepburn, H. R., Pirk, C. W. W., & Duangphakdee, O. (2014). The Role of Pollen in Honeybee Colonies. In Honeybee Nests (pp. 145-173). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2