> I wouldn't go so far as comparing CCD to theology.

I would not either.  Compare a set of symptoms to a study of "the study
of the nature of God and religious truth; rational inquiry into
religious questions."? That is almost nonsensical.  Who would?

If you are going to disagree - and please by all means do - I'd much
appreciate it if you would take care to disagree with what I actually
said and not some misconstruction of those carefully considered words.

For the record, I said: "...the whole _discussion_ of CCD reminds me
more of a _theological debate_ than science."

Please disagree with that, if you can.  Thanks.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html