BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"E.t. Ash" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Aug 2017 06:59:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
a randy oliver snip followed by my comment or question...

Bill, I haven't seen evidence to support the above claim.  It appears to be
rare for a mite outside of the cell to not be on a bee at all times.  Thus
your hypothesis that phoretic mites are crawling over the OA-exposed comb
surfaces is questionable.

>it would seem logical to me that some times mites are on bees and sometimes not. lots of grafting with a magnifying glass and light informs me that the mites do move around quite a bit off the bees and over the face of a comb and quite frequently. you may have no evidence but my eyes and experience does inform me they do move around without the aid of a honeybee.

although you reduce varroa biology to a ratio related to brood in the hive most often in looking at other biological specimens (cows, pigs, dogs) I find some level of nutrition is the actual causal agent.  I guess what I am suggesting here is your ratio MAY BE more in line with a correlation and not the cause.

Gene in central Texas   

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2