BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:49:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Continuing the discussion Re: contradictory conclusions, breeding for hygienic behavior has been carried out for more than half a century. And yet, the following suggests that this trait has not been enhanced in Australia bees.

> 32 colonies derived from various commercial lines were tested for expression of hygienic behaviour using the liquid nitrogen field assay. Of these colonies, 4 (12.5%) exhibited distinct hygienic behaviour, 13 (41%) were distinctly non-hygienic and the remaining 15 (46.5%) intermediate between the two (Figure 4.5). This is in agreement with the findings of Oldroyd that only approximately 20% of commercial honeybee stock in Australia expresses the hygienic behavioural phenotype (Oldroyd 1996a). It is very surprising that there has been _no improvement in the frequency of the hygienic trait since 1995_, as industry has made considerable efforts to distribute hygienic stock.

Breeding hygienic disease resistant bees
A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
by Keryn Wilkes & Dr. Ben Oldroyd
School of Biological Sciences
University of Sydney May 2002 RIRDC Publication

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2