BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:17:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
...populous hives are more likely to
> test hygienic than
> smaller hives...

Then, this is saying that in the freeze kill method,
the tests can be compromised due to varying colony
strength.

I would expect that the 'liquid nitrogen' test is much
dependent on colony size as you are killing such a
large patch of brood that otherwise might overwhelm a
smaller hygienic colony causing it to test negative.
Once you get such a large patch of brood killed,
division of labor plays a much bigger role.

But I have been using the pin prick method and have
found that there was no difference in testing results
between large colonies and nucs.  In fact, a similar
number of smaller colonies tested positive as did
larger.   This is the method Bob Russell from NZ uses
and has mentioned that he sees no difference in
testing due to strength.

Joe



__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2