BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NJ PROPOSED Bee keeper regulations
From:
Przemek Skoskiewicz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:31:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
There was a similar call for action for Maryland beekeepers in December issue of Bee Culture. Similar constraints are being proposed there, despite the strong input from the MD beekeeping representatives. I wonder what is provoking such legislative changes given all the sympathy that honey bees and pollinators of all kinds have enjoyed for the past few years. How bad the few bad apples had to be to provoke such restrictions?!

Przemek

> On Dec 31, 2017, at 5:19 PM, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> I want to present what the NJ Board of Agriculture is attempting to get
>> into law
>> 
> 
> Wow, time for NJ beekeepers to mobilize!

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2