BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 May 2003 20:40:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
James Kilty writes

"The point is that treating uniformly rather then as needed hides good
quality. If this good quality was added to the set of criteria then
surely the bees would get better. Animal and plant breeders do it. The
best of the best are also very gentle. In your case, if all are gentle,
then further selection would be a bonus. If not, then what do you do?
Requeen?"

I requeen for gentleness, but if I could spend 2 dollars and 10 minutes
once a year to make my bees gentle, like I do to keep my bees mite free, I
would.

And yes, breeders do it, but very few commerical farmers. It will be nice
if you can breed a strain of bees that are productive, disease resistant,
mite resistent and gentle. I don't have the resources or knowledge though.

Regards
Tim

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2