BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Peter L. Borst" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:45:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Ruth Rosin has written for many years about the so called bee
language. In a nutshell, she states that while the dances may or may
not contain some information, -- bees cannot understand it. Therefore,
ultimately NO information is communicated and thus it is not a
language at all. Also, a simpler explanation exists: bees sniff out
flowers.

By this logic we can scrutinize Ruth's explanation. Her theory may or
may not contain validity but as no one has accepted it over all these
years, ultimately NO information is communicated and thus it is not a
viable theory. While she claims that millions of people cling to a
mistaken belief that bees communicate by dancing, a simpler
explanation exists.

There are many examples where the simple explanation of phenomena just
won't do. Like, the earth is apparently flat and the sun and moon
apparently move across the sky. Perhaps for some, the notion that the
earth is a huge sphere spinning at a thousand miles per hour is a
complicated explanation for a simple observation. A simpler
explanation can be found: earth flat, sun moves.

So,-- often a complicated explanation is needed and the simple one is
plain wrong.

pb

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2