> Over the weekend I talked to a couple people which do published research
> and both said the research was flawed and should not have been published
> without a clear explanation for the results not being accurate and the
> whole test needed ran again!

Something Bob did not say, and something which we all should keep in mind,
is that *all* research is flawed in some way, and *all* tests need to be run
again ...and again.  Even then, we are still usually (always?) missing
something.

Maybe in light of this fact, the criticism does not seem quite as harsh, or
discriminatory.

allen

I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb
as the next guy.
            -- Richard Feynman

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---