BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Fredericksen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:36:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:35:19 EDT, Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>
>I'm losing patience with these proclamations exonerating stationary
>beekeepers (we know that they get CCD too) and pretending that CCD is a problem  of
>migratory beekeepers, who only experience CCD when in CA.  The  evidence is
>clearly to the contrary.
>

Jerry
Can you please share some of the "evidence" to back this statement up? 

I find it very hard to believe that the majority of hives affected by CCD are not owned by a 
relatively small number of beekeepers who are migratory. 

Are you implying that the numbers of CCD lost hives by non-migratory beekeepers is even 
significant in numbers? 

I'm curious as to what is the migratory vs non-migratory CCD losses in numbers of hives and 
number of beekeepers affected respectively? 

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2