BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:02:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> ‘Apistan provided 100% control in South Carolina whereas in Georgia it
> provided 0% control in colonies treated exclusively with Apistan. In the
> presence of a bottom screen Apistan-treated colonies in Georgia experienced
> an average mite control of 44.3%.’
>

All that showed was that Apistan could still drop mites, but not kill them.
So any mechanism (smoke was another method along with FGMO) that could drop
mites would keep the population down a bit, but try going into winter with
the remaining 55.7% of Varroa that was left.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2