BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:22:15 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
> We have many years of data regarding rates of supercedure in commercial
bee
> operations in the Northwestern states - marked queens, 10-12 colonies per
> apiary, many apiaries, many years.

People often talk about supercedure as if it somehow reduces production,
but in my understanding, it should not.  In fact, I should think that
supercedure might often increase populations if the two queens co-exist for
some time, and should in the long term assure continuity of the colony.

To me it seems that what *could* reduce production is not the supercedure,
but the conditions that bring supercedure about in the first place -- like
a failing queen -- not the supercedure itself.

Does that fit with your perceptions, or am I missing something?

allen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2