Bob said:
"but FGMO
was tested by three noted beekeepers".

I am sure you would agree that there are at least 3 beekeepers who have
tested FGMO and found it to be effective in the treatment of varroa as
well. I am glad to hear about the "master beekeeping certificates".

Bob said:
Too early for you to call your treatment a success.

While I agree that some colonies may be resistant to varroa for 2 years, I
dont believe that can be said about "all my colonies" Yes, I am a hobbiest
with 15 colonies. I would be interested in finding out if others are
willing to risk there colonies "without a successful treatment" as you
call FGMO.
I am glad that you pointed out the fact that Dr. R is using Thymol in cord
form. Apparently there is some confusion, as Bill posted it as...
"With FGMO you are putting it into an aerosol form, plus in an applicator
under pressure. I doubt the EPA had that in mind as an application
method for Thymol".

Bob, you also point out the fact that the formula for FGMO is constantly
changing. I hardly think that the changes made thus far can be construed
as significant alterations
2.added the fogger (different method of application)
3.added  the cords (additional method for continual application)
4.added honey & beeswax (products already in the hive)

Isnt interesting that it is a "concern" that DR. R is continually trying
to improve his formula. It would concern me if beekeeping never improved.
Where would we be today without the removeable frame, foundation wax or
the honey extractor. I say let those continue to improve and invent if
they have the ability to do so.

Thanks for the exchange,

Kurt Bower
Julian, North Carolina

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::