BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Benson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:19:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dee Lusby wrote:
> though I think it a
> given for the smaller like I mentioned.
>   

Why is this "a given".  Just because it sounds like a nice tidy package, 
doesn't make it so.  This wider variety of pollen thing is yet another 
of the unsubstantiated claims of the SC folks that quite frankly, they 
could show is or isn't true in a relatively short period of time without 
making too much of a time investment.  Of course it would throw a monkey 
wrench in the whole thing to find out there was no change . . . .

I have some small cell bees - I see no differences in the pollen 
collected between them, my LC bees and my TBH.
> So who you gonna get to do it?
>   
Traditionally this falls to the people proposing the new information.  
That would be you.

Keith

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2