BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2017 08:01:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>
> >You miss the point,  except for a few ELAP lovers,  commercial beeks
> don't let the hives collapse,  that’s how they get to stay commercial.
>

Absolutely true Charlie, in the case of almond pollinators, but not
necessarily so for honey producers that don't intend to go to
almonds--dependent upon the price of honey and package bees.

Let's say that a Midwestern beekeeper in October is having to make the
decision as to whether put on another 30 lbs of honey, or to do a mite
treatment.  If he foregoes treatment and allows his colonies to collapse in
November, he could harvest not only that 30 lbs of bonus honey, but perhaps
an additional 50 lbs from the brood chambers.  80 lbs of honey at $2/lb =
$160 in his pocket.  He would then not need to spend for mite treatment,
nor care for his colonies over the winter, and then take the winter off.

Come spring, he can pay $100 for packages, for a net gain of $60/hive, over
what he already made for his main honey harvest.  This strategy apparently
works for some.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2