BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"E.t. Ash" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:11:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
a snip from Peter Borst...
(1)  Introduction losses, (2)  abnormal and drone-laying queens, (3) abnormal supersedure of queens that lay normally, (4) accidental loss during hive manipulations, and (5) the normal supersedure of failing or worn-out queens.

Thanks for adding this.  I almost automatically lean towards this kind of thinking to first specify exactly how the same mechanism may be different.  I would also suggest that there could be an intermediate category between #3 and #4 which I have seen here (accidentally done here) on several occasion when I have had new queens in small 5 frame nuc boxs and inadvertently reversed one outside frame that contained eggs.  I do think in this form of accidental beekeeper manipulated supersedure that variable wether also is also a critical factor in generating the supersedure cell.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2